Sunday, January 21, 2007

It's STILL the Economy, Stupid

From my kitchen table I watch the snow sticking to our porch screen, whiting out my usual view of the woods behind our house. I am waiting for the snow to stop so I can plow the driveway. It is mid-January in Cedar Rapids, Iowa and this is the first snow of any consequence, so plowing the driveway really isn’t such a burden. On some years by this time I was worried I was going to wear my snow blower out, but not this year.

My name is Tony. You can picture me as a middle-aged man, with a middle-management job, a mid-range income, and unfortunately middle-age spread, sitting at his kitchen table in the Midwest. I’m not an economist or a political pundit, just your average guy with a driveway full of snow. That’s my caveat for what is to follow. I’m going to give you the view from my seat at the kitchen table. Your view might be very different.

I started my political life as a Reagan Republican. I loved his "city set on a hill" vision of America. Keep in mind that when President Reagan took office, the biggest problem facing the nation was "stagflation," the wicked combination of a stagnant economy and uncontrolled inflation. Reagan's theory was to ignore the problem of inflation while stimulating the economy. President Reagan loved the phrase "a rising tide raises all boats." This began an economic boom that continued, with sustained attention and adjustments, for many years through several administrations.

On the other hand, if I could describe George W. Bush’s fiscal policies in a simple phrase it would be “a rising tide raises all yachts.” He has siphoned the tidewater from the open ocean of the economy and walled it up behind a dam of privilege where only the powerful benefit. But just like New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, that levee will eventually come crashing down, revealing all that has been hidden, in all of its repugnant splendor. The only choice we have is, do we want to wait until it all crashes on us at once, or do we want to begin a controlled reduction of the pressure from the imbalance in the economy?

From here in Middle America there is a belief that there must be a middle way, not of soft-headed socialism or hard hearted capitalism, but of people-powered progressivism. I still believe that stimulating the general economy while rolling the extra tax revenue into social programs is the best way to resolve the disparity of wealth. If we can grow the economy in a way that the impact is felt at every financial stratum, we will provide hope for all the people of America, not just the privileged few. If we want to create hope where there is currently despair, wealth has to be circulated into the economy, not horded at the top. The purpose of wealth is to help others achieve some level of wealth. Obviously that’s not what we’ve been doing for the last six years.

Of course, as I’m writing this, I’m typing on my new laptop, sitting at my lovely kitchen table in middle-America, which is quite the seat of privilege. So, I could be wrong. Right now, instead of looking for a third way, I’ve got to go plow my driveway. I’ll see all of you in the living rooms and meeting rooms of Iowa as we try to work this way out together.

Labels: , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger benny06 said...

Senator Clinton is supposed to visit DM and Cedar Rapids. Are you going to see her while she is in your town, and if so, what will you ask her if she meets with folks such as yourself?

January 21, 2007 1:18 PM  
Blogger RFD Blog said...

First, if you know when Senator Clinton will be visiting, please let me know so I can try to arrange to see her. If I had a chance to ask her any questions, I would ask:
1.The US has failed to uphold Civil Liberties and Human Rights. We have warrantless spying by the NSA. We have used Extraordinary Rendition to outsource torture. We have maintained secret prisons. We have violated the Geneva Convention. We have suspended Habeas Corpus. What will you do to make sure that the US leads the world in Civil Liberties and Human Rights?
2. Would you sign the Kyoto Protocol to reduce greenhouse gasses? If not, then what would you do to address global warming?
3. Will you make the US a member state of the International Criminal Court?
4. What will you do to reduce international arms trade?
5. What is your position on media consolidation and net neutrality?
6. What would you do to protect the public interest in a free and independent media?
7. Will you continue the use of presidential signing statements?
8. Here's the tough one for a Senator from New York. What would you do about the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank? Would you be willing to withhold military aid from Israel in order to get them to comply with existing UN resolutions?

What about you? What would you ask?

P.S., I see that you support the use of hybrid cars. I drive a Prius. Rock on!

January 21, 2007 1:49 PM  
Blogger benny06 said...

I drive a Prius. And on my blog, I do say what I have been doing to help the environment. Thanks for noticing.

What would I ask Senator Clinton, if she came to my town next Sat?

I would ask her how she really wants to help our country, as opposed to her ego, but I would figure out a way to ask that q differently in order to get more transparency in her answer. But then, I don't know that she would be honest. I think after she helped Geo McGovern in organizing campaigns, she learned from the experience she couldn't be transparent.

I would ask with a new Dem House and Senate what she intends to initiate in terms of legislation other than for NY.

Why does she not back away in funding the surge altogether. She says she doesn't support the Iraqi gov't. I get it as to why, but Edwards said it first, you have to say you are leaving.

I'm guessing Mrs. Clinton is hoping along with others across the aisle that W will hang himself. My spouse who is Republican, sez so as well.

January 22, 2007 7:30 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home